Write a critical review of a journal article Essay

Write a critical review of a journal article - Essay Example In depth studies are being undertaken due to the different contributing factors to the onset of such disabilities specifically the genetic factors, the environmental factors and the social factors. Due to the extensive number of variables needed to be considered there is also the problem of lack of baseline data that can be used for comparative analysis of studies undertaken. There are different factors covered in the study such as the causes of developmental disabilities, challenges in the research process, clinical study of toxic elements known to affect the neurodevelopment such as lead, mercury, manganese, polychlorinated biphenyls, flame retardants, pesticides, nicotine, and alcohol and other solvents. Upon analysis of the article by Schettler, it can be considered that the study is more of a library based research since the data are presented on a textual manner. It can be considered qualitative in nature based on the same reason that the topics discussed are presented in paragraph form and there are no tabulated data. According to the determination of the source of the article, it had been known that it is a derivation from another article written by the author, thus, compared to the reference article, this one can be considered as an abridged or shorter form. On a reader’s perspective, the article was able to present a general point regarding the importance of an in depth study on the factors affecting the different types of neurological disabilities but if one is interested in an in depth determination of the factors and their specific mechanisms, it is important to have a more quantitative presentation of the data. In relation to the fact that the article is based on a nother article, the data presented cannot be considered as first hand although it is written by the same author. The fact that the data in this article is only based on the article which discussed the toxic threats in child development,

Industrial Organization Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

Industrial Organization - Term Paper Example The seller sets PËÆ'Ã' ²S, buyer holds its belief while the seller makes no sells if PË‚Ã' ²S. (c) The buyer only buys at PË‚Ã' ²B but the seller is at take it or live and only willing to sell at P≠¥Ã' ²S.so the expected utility of the buyer will be at only P≠¥U, thus the utility will be u=Ã' ²B if he buys the product and 0 if he does not. As long the seller sets its price P≠¥Ã' ²S, there would be no clearing price and no trade takes place between the two as the buyers are not willing to spend more. (d) High prices reduces public demand hence little trade takes place between sellers and buyers {Tirole Jean, 1988}. In real life sellers actually set prices so as to compensate their production cost equivalent to MC and does not reduce it since they would make a loss. (a) Probability of buying high quality=4/5 and the probability of buying low quality=1/5. Since the product quality are observable, the willingness to buy high quality is 4/5 while the willingness to buy low quality is 1/5. (b) (i)As the firm provides warranty they incur extra cost of w. thus expected utilities becomes, for high quality  ½[10Ãâ€"4/5+0]=4. Expected utility for low quality,  ½[1/5Ãâ€"4+0]=0.4(Tirole & Jean, 1988). Since the expected utility for high quality is higher than the low quality and the information is unknown, consumers will go for higher quality foregoing the low quality. If low quality offers warranty they will make no sales thus their warranty is 0 while setting their price at c/PL=0.8=p. (c) If firms cannot offer warranty and the consumers are rational, they will go for high quality products since information is believed to be asymmetric. Consumers will buy products that will last and sure will work. (d) Profits of b is less than the profits of c. since consumers are assumed to be rational in c, there would be more sales as more high quality products would be sold as opposed to when the information is unknown in b. (e) In case of two firms, a firm with higher warranty would make